Supreme Court cases involving government and religion are always interesting. Often the outcomes seem to vary depending on the particular facts of a case. Usually that means that the Court is trying to balance expression of religion and the governmental "entanglement" with religion.
In October, the Court will consider a case involving a cross erected as a military memorial in a federal preserve. Here is the L. A. Times story on the case.
Two years ago, the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals . . .declared the cross an "impermissible governmental endorsement of religion."As you may recall, the U. S. Constitution does not contain the phrase "separation of church and state."
. . .
Bush administration lawyers appealed to the Supreme Court last fall and said the "seriously misguided decision" would require the government "to tear down a cross that has stood without incident for 70 years as a memorial to fallen service members."
. . .
In a friend-of-the-court brief, the VFW, American Legion and other veterans groups said the 9th Circuit's ruling, if allowed to stand, could trigger legal challenges to the display of crosses at Arlington National Cemetery and elsewhere.
(Photo by Clearly Ambiguous; used by permission.)
No comments:
Post a Comment